美国电影爱国者观后感（电影《爱国者》的英文影评（200字左右））

本文目录

• 电影《爱国者》的英文影评（200字左右）
• 战争片 观后感100字
• 电影爱国者的英文观后感
• 爱国者的影片评价
• 爱国电影观后感（最少3篇）

电影《爱国者》的英文影评（200字左右）

Speaking of the “Patriot“ movie, had to mention the American constitutional system and the founding spirit of democracy. See today, the U.S. constitutional system of democratic practice is more successful ~.
At that time a religious, self-control, sacrifice and dedication of the position under the U.S. founding fathers adopted the Jefferson’s “separation of powers“ (America’s democracy, human rights, equal rights), and President Washington’s “re-election does not more than twice “idea - is a democratic constitutional system with a high degree of religious belief in the morality of self-made democracy, it is a power of supervision and local autonomy is respected, the political system. The American spirit of freedom and democracy is now the world should also be a model of spiritual civilization and advanced representatives - perhaps this is the most humane spirit of the origin of it, because it highlights a “human spirit“ of victory - and this is “personal heroism,“ the inevitable result.
This time, the “Patriot“ is indeed completed a “Root asked the source“ of the classical regression. Because the spirit of American freedom and democracy after all, is “personal heroism“ nurture the soil.
First, it should be said, the film’s screenplay written pretty good, with plenty of lyrical narrative plot to seize the audience’s sympathy for justice. Is a typical “driven to revolt“ type of story. Benjamin Martin colonel who was once the wounds of war, trying to make up the moral standards of the past to suppress themselves and their families, expect the war to neutral survival. But in the current war in the form below, any person who holds to this idea only alleys; Moreover, the influence of patriotism by the eldest son Jeb Rio has decided to join the army, father, like son. Thus the father and son made some foreshadowing later guerrilla organization. The guerrilla war is undoubtedly more than the film “heinous“ in conventional warfare (read some of these subjects who shared the movie ~) more emphasis on teamwork, operational skills and flexibility. So, after another exciting chapter ..., Colonel Martin to a fight for peace, national independence and freedom of the war caused a sensation.
The film further reflected the spirit of American freedom and democracy, and below this is a reminder issued by the public mind with personal heroism. And “public spirit“ is the Western liberal democracy. The heroine of this film, not only in silent support behind the front men of their families. This seems to highlight the most “personal heroism,“ a feature film, is always to highlight the role of women in male roles, and set off. (“True Lies“ is an exception).
The only drawback is the film’s soundtrack very plain, the melody of the film subject’s response is not perfect. In addition, the film is how to obtain R-rating? Another question might be worth a little look. Here I will not say more ~. ^ _ ^

“Lang,“ said the film should be magnanimous. For me, though the film back to life would have been sufficient. However, the image behind the return of human nature is the most exciting and gives a revelation. To the guitar lessons when QUE teacher this semester so that we really view films intended to show it, this has caused a number of people thinking.
Hope that the times in the context of her once again been confirmed.谷歌了一份，很粗糙，你可以修改一下

战争片 观后感100字

看了《爱国者》，很受感动。影片讲述的是一段美国独立战争的历史。主人公是一位议员和一群孩子的父亲。一家人过得还算和谐。作为父亲，他在家里有着相当的威严，而一群孩子也不是吃素的，他们的顽皮让这位父亲吃尽苦头却又无可奈何。但因其反对对英国作战而被孩子们误解，他们都有着自己的参军梦，甚至远远听到枪炮声，他们也会熟练搬出枪以备不时之需。然而英军的的到来改变了一切。在家园被毁又即将失去第二个儿子时父亲终于爆发了，和两个小儿子一起歼灭了一股二十一人的英军，这让人联想到他当年的英姿，也让他找回了自己潜藏的勇气。在复仇和追求自由这两条主线的引导下，主人公带领着国民军逐步走向胜利。
影片花了很大的手笔来阐述美国对自由的向往和因此付出的沉重代价，从激烈的议会讨论，人们参军的热情，到家园的被毁，战场上的惨烈牺牲。相信看过该片的决不会忘记那些古老而又独特的战争场面，两军（正规军）对垒都是以人员和武器作为筹码，而这往往是英军占优，美军是即输场面又输战争，这看上去有点幽默的味道，完全是对现代战争的颠覆，看不到现代战争中的谋军布局。而国民军却也会玩游击战，有一段时间竟被英军称之为“幽灵”，很有点中国特色的味道。但这确实是一支杂牌军，就连教堂里的牧师也披装上阵，只是不知道他在杀人之前会不会念上一句“上帝保佑”，其最后的牺牲却也充满了悲剧色彩。

电影爱国者的英文观后感

THE PATRIOT Roland Emmerich, USA, 2000
Mel Gibson is a movie star. A really big one, even. He’s got charisma and presence and lights up the screen and is pleasingly handsome in a rugged, non-pretty-boy kind of way. He’s funny and charming on talkshows and makes lots of money for all of the above. This much we know. What remains a bit of a mystery is how he maintains such status. His star-power is firmly rooted in the seemingly ancient Lethal Weapon series and the quip-throwing, fast drawing, scene-chewing character he plays in it seems to have overtaken his public persona as well. Does anyone actually know anyone who even saw Lethal Weapon 4? The more appropriate question perhaps being: does anybody remember it? Does anybody care?
Since Mel Gibson is a movie star by trade, he is also tangentially an actor. And in his new film, The Patriot, he has a listless taciturnity that one could diplomatically describe as “understated“ or, if so inclined, “Gary Cooper-ish.“ Ultimately, though, Gibson’s performance just seems false -- hollow in an utterly competent, completely professional way. In the age of Jim Carrey and Fight Club, Being John Malkovich and Ben Stiller, Gibson’s style of acting doesn’t seem so much old school as plain inadequate. This is not to run roughshod over classical notions of subtlety or interiority, but merely to say that if he was once emblematic of his time, Gibson’s moment has passed. Perhaps he is simply inching towards some exclusive hideaway of insignificance, where he can commiserate over the rising price of jet fuel with Kevin Costner and Harrison Ford.
It’s not all his fault, either, The Patriot. And it’s not even that it’s a bad movie, it’s just not good either; it just is. Created by the director/producer team of Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin, The Patriot is caught in the double bind of wanting to be two semi-incompatible things at once. On the one hand, the project has the air of an important, high-style heritage picture about a simple farmer trying to escape his past sins and keep his family together during trying times. But set against the backdrop of the Revolutionary War, the movie continually feels an alternate pull towards being a blood-and-guts actioner. Over the course of its 2 1/2 hours, the film often seems at war with itself -- every time it starts to move with a steady flow, building momentum, it suddenly finds itself in a little narrative eddy, taking time out for a funeral, or a wedding, or to reiterate how bad the bad guys are (as in not good) and how the good guys are simple folk just trying to get along and colonially do their thing.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1069/is_4_36/ai_63973804
这里还有
http://www.popmatters.com/film/reviews/p/patriot.shtml
http://www.splicedonline.com/00reviews/patriot.html
http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/p/patriot.html
这个是别人的答案，拿过来借花献佛了……

爱国者的影片评价

可以说，关于美国独立战争的电影并不多，这是一次描写普通人在那段年代的生活和他们如何面对特殊境遇的好机会，除了历史元素之外，影片还深刻的揭示了人生。（时光网评）
这种血腥的庆祝最终给予了美国革命应得的一部史诗般的作品。（沙龙网评）
影片充满活力与激情，对得起买电影票花的钱。（《芝加哥太阳报》评）
雷霆万钧的景象。（《滚石》评）
感情上很有张力，既不闷也不无聊。（《Variety》杂志评） 这部电影冗长、空洞、虚假。（《旧金山纪事报》评）
伪善过度，悲情过火，全是美国独立日那种陈词滥调。（《巴尔的摩太阳报》评）
本片的确受益于吉布森的魅力……至于电影本身是否足够好，那就是另外一个问题了。（《洛杉矶时报》评）

爱国电影观后感（最少3篇）

我重温了几部经典的爱国主义电影，感触颇多。李向阳之所以成为英雄，朴志高之所以成为叛徒，毕玉玺之所以成为贪污犯，有着种种原因。　　当走到人生十字路口时，是什么力量决定他们（今后也许就是我们这一代年轻人）选择正路还是邪路，如何坚定地走好正路。是信念！信念是人生的罗盘，决定人生的方向，决定人生的成败。如何才能保持信念的正确性呢？我认为加强对先进思想理论的学习，是确保信念正确性的关键途径。　　一个理论薄弱的政党，不可能有创造力凝聚力战斗力，不可能担负起自己的领导职责；同样一个思想贫乏的人，不可能胜任现代社会的重要工作，不可能充分实现自身价值。加强先进思想理论学习，提高自身综合修养，对于每一个人都是重要的，而在参加工作后更为重要。每个人都是从社会中来的，并且今天还是生活在这个社会中，经常和这个社会中一切不好的东西接触，他会或多或少地带有社会上的不良思想意识和习惯。为了保持自身的纯洁，提高思想品质和工作能力，每个人都必须从各方面加强先进思想理论的学习，提高自己修养。　　那么先进的思想理论都包括什么呢？我认为能够指导人们适应自然和社会环境，积极改造现实，促进社会和谐发展，实现人生价值等的思想理论就是先进的，包括古今中外一切优秀思想和理论，如马列主义、中国传统思想理论中积极的部分等。　　通过什么途径可以获得先进的思想理论资料呢？我认为有以下四种途径：第一种途径是浏览互联网。当今世界是高度信息化的世界，互联网是信息的海洋，里面有各种各样的信息资料。绝大部分书刊、资料都有电子稿，可以在互联网上阅读。如人民日报电子版不仅有时事，更有主流政治理论。方便、快捷、重要的是便宜，甚至免费。免费的精神食粮弃之不顾，实在是可惜。第二种途径是阅读图书。图书可以购买，或是借阅。第三种途径是学校学习。这是传统主流的，不必多言。第四种途径是工作生活中的感悟。这一点我也是听说的，年轻，还没有太多的认识。　　就我个人而言，怎样做才算加强先进的思想理论学习呢？第一，学习岗位知识技能。第二，学习党的基本理论知识。第三，学习中国传统文化和国外文化的精华，多阅读史书典籍，如《史记》、《资治通鉴》、《孟子》等。第四，知道自然科学发展的最新成果，尽量保持与时代同步。说起来容易，做起来难！要持之以恒，更要有严谨的计划。同时必须坚持实践是检验真理的唯一标准，坚持解放思想、实事求是、与时俱进，坚持不唯上、不唯书、只唯实，用实践去发展丰富自身修养。